Talk:Abu-Abdullah Adelabu

Latest comment: 2 years ago by 109.252.100.132 in topic External links modified

Untitled

edit

The editor has cited quite a few sources, magazines and newspapers, etc. I don't think that it's fair to say that this doesn't support/assert notability. It's certainly not in any way controversial or inflammatory--I don't see why this is a speedy delete and I feel the editor should be given a chance to defend or improve the work.

This was marked for speedy once, first time by me, and the editor added sources. It was marked for copyright vio and the editor added official permissions (all done with links to tickets on the talk page and everything, although they need to be re-added to this version). It's been marked AGAIN and the editor has made yet /more/ citations, following the advice I left on his/her talk page...

These are strong indicators of good faith--shouldn't we show the same? Wysdom 15:54, 22 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

- I'm not sure of the standard of some of the sources, an ISSN link I tried doesn't check out, and one of the newspapers is published from Clifton New Jersey - not sure if these are major trusted sources.--Lopakhin (talk) 01:56, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Page move needed

edit

Lopakhin, you seem to be editing the page right now, so I won't move this to Abu-Abdullah Adelabu at the moment. Could you do it when you reach a stopping point? Thanks. Picaroon (t) 01:58, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Okay, you've moved on to something else, so I'll move it now. Picaroon (t) 02:18, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Notability

edit

The article doesn't make clear why the authors thought this passed WP:BIO. Is this presented under WP:PROF (acadmic biography or what)? Just because somebody is a scholar or academic doesn't mean they should have a Wikipedia biography article. --dab (𒁳) 09:52, 19 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Abu-Abdullah Adelabu. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:16, 25 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Date of birth is needed.--109.252.100.132 (talk) 04:19, 12 December 2021 (UTC)Reply