Talk:Academic imperialism

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled

edit

So ... its a short, mostly-opinion page summarizing exactly one sociology article published eleven years ago. It has been cited 21 times since then http://academic.research.microsoft.com/Publication/44575724/academic-dependency-and-the-global-division-of-labour-in-the-social-sciences

There are many, many single sociology papers of more significance than this. There are a ton of science papers more significant than this. How does one nominate this for deletion? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crispincowan (talkcontribs) 02:40, 29 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

The fact that the article currently has shortcomings does not equals that the topic it covers is irrelavant. I see no valid argument for irrelevancy. There are plenty of sources and google academic searches gives shows a wide usage of the term. Sietecolores (talk) 02:51, 10 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

The fact that the paper was published 11 years ago and has only 21 citations [1]in that time is an affirmative proof that it **is** irrelevant and trivial. If it was of any significance, it would have been cited more often than that. Crispincowan (talk) 07:56, 5 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

References

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Academic imperialism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:37, 25 June 2017 (UTC)Reply