Talk:Acceptable use policy

Untitled

I'm playing with AUPs at the moment. The one question which I can't answer is: how long (or short) should one be?

What a poor article about AUPs, or should we say "Acceptable Use Policy" documents. There is a very much wider range of issues about AUP documents: Who writes them? What are the range of topics contained in a AUP? How enforceable are AUP documents? Guidelines for businesses writing AUP documents. A range of AUP documents applying to general Internet users. and more . . . I will in the next few days attempt a rewrite of this document to make it into a much better and more representative of Wikipedia articles. The article also needs Wikification, and a much better list of categories. So expect more from me in the next few days. andyman 01:11, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

I have started researching this topic and possibly need to widen the topic to include documents that essentially do the same thing as AUP documents. Google asks all it Gmail customers to accept a "Terms of Use" which sets out "acceptable use policies" amongst a general description of their service. andyman 01:20, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

There are some aspects I still am working on -- I need to support some statements with a link. Am doing that work now. andyman 02:33, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

POV tag

This concerns POV tag cleanup. Whenever an POV tag is placed, it is necessary to also post a message in the discussion section stating clearly why it is thought the article does not comply with POV guidelines, and suggestions for how to improve it. This permits discussion and consensus among editors. This is a drive-by tag, which is discouraged in WP, and it shall be removed. Future tags should have discussion posted as to why the tag was placed, and how the topic might be improved. Better yet, edit the topic yourself with the improvements. This statement is not a judgement of content, it is only a cleanup of frivolously and/or arbitrarily placed tags. No discussion, no tag.Jjdon (talk) 21:17, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

I just readded it without knowing at that time that it had been removed in the past. The article appears to single out specific companies and organizations too much; it appears to be pointing out what companies have strict AUPs and which ones have tolerant AUPs rather than explaining what an AUP is. I think the article needs to be rewritten to meet Wikipedia's standards, including our NPOV policy. GO-PCHS-NJROTC ^(Messages) 03:09, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

I dispute the neutrality of the section on enforceability, as it seems more in the nature of an instruction on how a provider may make its terms of service enforceable, rather than a description of the treatment of this subject in scholarly sources. Bwrs (talk) 08:08, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

AUP policy guide to uni virginia broken

Virginia Department of Education Handbook for writing AUP documents [last ref] is broken —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.194.154.136 (talk) 15:24, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

This has been addressed. DaveARose (talk) 07:33, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Acceptable use policy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Attempted to fix sourcing for http://ec.hcahealthcare.com/CPM/ISSEC005.doc

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110719023012/http://www.ccps.k12.fl.us/Downloads/COSC0809.pdf to http://www.ccps.k12.fl.us/Downloads/COSC0809.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:10, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Acceptable use policy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140301173111/http://www.talktalk.co.uk/legal/tiscali-product/fair-usage-policy/ to http://www.talktalk.co.uk/legal/tiscali-product/fair-usage-policy/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070331155213/http://www.pen.k12.va.us/VDOE/Technology/AUP/home.shtml to http://www.pen.k12.va.us/VDOE/Technology/AUP/home.shtml
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070701161457/http://title3.sde.state.ok.us/technology/aup.htm to http://title3.sde.state.ok.us/technology/aup.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070506164902/http://www.lboro.ac.uk/computing/policies/loughborough-aup.html to http://www.lboro.ac.uk/computing/policies/loughborough-aup.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:19, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Acceptable use policy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081120134226/http://www2.embarq.com/legal/acceptableuse.html to http://www2.embarq.com/legal/acceptableuse.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:07, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

@InternetArchiveBot Ferdinand Icatlo (talk) 17:40, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Delete or keep an index to this subject?

This week there's discussion about whether to delete or keep the Index of Articles Relating to Terms of Service and Privacy Policies, which I created in early August. That index helps readers find:

• this article
• articles on different aspects of terms of service
• articles which cover terms of service at specific companies

Wikipedians are welcome to improve the index, and/or discuss if it should be deleted or kept available. Numbersinstitute (talk) 16:40, 13 September 2017 (UTC)