Talk:Access Copyright

Canada: Law Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian law.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A confusingly-named article, although it did get my attention; but I thought it was about the database. I think it would be better to spell it out in the title and just use c-in-circle within the article. Stan 17:46 May 12, 2003 (UTC)

That is their name and is often used (exactly to get people's attention) however if some of you grey eminences around here think that it creates sorting problems then go ahead and change it. I don't think it will bother them (but I think they use lowercase as in access copyright not Access Copyright when it is written out. Alex756 19:29 May 12, 2003 (UTC)

Heh, after three months I'm hardly a grey eminence! :-) Stan 20:52 May 12, 2003 (UTC)

With the turnover I've seen on a lot of contributors anyone who gets past that first hump is and ol'timer. After all if the birth of Wikipedia was in 2001 then 3 months is about 1/9 the life of the project, this converts into about nine years of lifespan time (over 80 years) I think I would go grey after 3 months (actually I'm grey already). Besides, I'm probably (this is not legal advice) making reference to your PhD in Lisp implentation and working at Apple at least from the early 90s (as far back as I can search on DejaNews) you are a grey eminence that has deemed Wikipedia of merit! Alex756

I decided to move this page to 'Access copyright' to make linking easier (not everyone is familiar with the copyright entity). -- Notheruser 21:41 May 12, 2003 (UTC)

Official corporate name is "The Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency" (please note the "The" ) . Also, this was listed as a non-profit (which in Canada implies charity). This corporation is a not-for-profit (something totally different under Canadian corporate law). 209.29.209.157 (talk) 16:01, 21 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Access Copyright. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:56, 3 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic