Talk:Acereae

Aceraceae

According to Harrington et al. 2005:"Given the possibility of long branch attraction being a confounding force in this placement, the opposite conclusion—that Aceraceae and Hippocastanaceae are distinct, monophyletic families easily distinguished from nearly all Sapindaceae – cannot be ruled out on this basis alone. Nevertheless, support for the basal relationships between the constituent main clades in our analyses are much weaker than the overall support for Sapindaceae s.l. ..." Berton 05:52, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

This case is very similar to the of Malvaceae sensu lato, where the APG and Kubitzki system recognize that Malvaceae s. str. is monophyletic, but for not leaving the remaining of Malvales paraphyletic, then everything was lumped as Malvaceae sensu lato. However the homogeneity of the taxon is much more important than this, and these classifications sensu lato should be totally rejected. Berton 06:11, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aceraceae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060226170716/http://delta-intkey.com:80/angio/www/aceracea.htm to http://delta-intkey.com/angio/www/aceracea.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:17, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Requested move 24 June 2026

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Moved as an uncontested request with minimal participation. If there is any objection within a reasonable time frame, please ask me to reopen the discussion; if I am not available, please ask at the technical requests page. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jeffrey34555 (talk) 03:59, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

---

Aceraceae → Acereae – Aceraceae has not been rejected as a clade; only its status as a family has been denied, and the same circumscription remains as the tribe Acereae. Rather than simply treating this article as pertaining to a taxon from the past, it is considered preferable to change the name to that of a currently valid taxon. コロネン (talk) 22:32, 24 June 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 17:35, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.