Talk:Acetal

Latest comment: 5 months ago by DMacks in topic Move to "Acetal and ketal"?

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

edit

  This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Andriyyuzvyak.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 13:19, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Image problem

edit

The carbon atom shown here only has three bonds. It needs to have a hydrogen on it (for acetals), or another R group (for ketals).

  • Missing H on C now fixed. Delta G 15:36, 11 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Glycoside

edit

Why is Glycoside redirected to this article? Nothing currently in the article text mentions glycoside. Could someone knowledgeable make the connection explicit? Thank you. -- Jeff Q 19:40, 10 Jul 2004 (UTC)

  • I agree the redirect was not obvious. I replaced it with a stub that links to glycosidic bond where things get explained in more depth. FYI, the tenuous link was that a glycoside contains an acetal. -- Delta G 14:39, 11 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Acetal

edit

how do you properly pronounce????

three syllables, ass-e-tal 203.218.87.192 01:46, 9 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Acetal formation image

edit

An IP left this comment in the article and I'm moving it here:

"This picture is incorrect: it starts with a ketone, therefore this is a ketal, not an acetal."

Wizard191 (talk) 21:11, 15 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

In modern terminology (now explained in the article), "ketal" is a more specific category within "acetal" rather than being two separate types that differ by ketone-vs-aldehyde. DMacks (talk) 12:07, 6 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thermal Expansion

edit

Terminology question

edit
Nope. I just added a link to the Gold Book ref for "ketals", which states "a subclass of acetals." DMacks (talk) 12:13, 6 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Merge Acetalisation into Acetal?

edit

One is a reaction, the other is the product of the reaction. There is not much content on the product, and actually a large part of the product article is about the reaction that makes it. Much of what's important about the product seems to be (or at least is highly related to) the specific chemistry of it, i.e., the reaction that forms it. Perhaps some day someone will write tons of material about one or the other enough to merit separate articles, but for now seems like it's duplicated content and/or closely related important content spread over multiple places. DMacks (talk) 12:17, 6 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Support per the nom. Wizard191 (talk) 18:42, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
Support seems to make sense to discuss the functional group in the same article as the synthesis thereof.--Smokefoot (talk) 21:15, 14 October 2012 (UTC)Reply


Acetal/ethanal...

edit

Acetal is also the name (shouldn't WP reflect this?) of a particular acetal, 1,1-diethoxyethane (named "acetal" after the three ethyl groups?). Confusingly, "acetal" looks like a synonym for "ethanal", which I see it is not. --lifeform (talk) 04:51, 2 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

We didn't have an article about that specific chemical on the English wikipedia (but did on other languages'). I created a stub article about it and added a hatnote link at the top of the page. DMacks (talk) 06:32, 2 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Move to "Acetal and ketal"?

edit

Ketal redirects here, which seems fine. Maybe the title should reflect that the article covers both? Beyond that title change, I dont have any special ideas. The article might not need separate sections on acetals vs ketals.--Smokefoot (talk) 20:14, 14 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Oppose renaming per naming guideline of being concise and precise. Ketals are a subset of acetals in current nomenclature. But I could easily see overhauling the article to be unified on that nomenclature except at the few locations talking about that historical nomenclature difference. DMacks (talk) 21:42, 14 June 2024 (UTC)Reply