Talk:Acoelomorpha

What distinguishes Acoelomorpha from Placozoa ? The description of the former sounds allot like the latter.

This page should say the approximate number of known species in the phylum. --Savant13 13:49, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Someone needs to find a reliable source for that. -- Donald Albury 12:21, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Validity disputed

See

Wallberg, A., Curini-Galletti, M., Ahmadzadeh, A. & Jondelius, U. (2007). Dismissal of Acoelomorpha: Acoela and Nemertodermatida are separate early bilaterian clades. — Zoologica Scripta, 36, 509–523.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Acoelomorpha. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060912001722/http://devbio.umesci.maine.edu/styler/globalworming/pintro.html to http://devbio.umesci.maine.edu/styler/globalworming/pintro.html
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://devbio.umesci.maine.edu/styler/turbellaria/turb2.php?action=1&code=12275

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:54, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Phylum?

According to the Xenacoelomorpha article, it is a clade, not a phylum. Which is correct?160.111.254.17 (talk) 15:29, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

"Phylum" is for people who care about such things. Phyla, for those who accept their existence, are clades, as are all biological divisions. Hard core cladists don't care about stamp-collecting labels, as long as the ordering is correct. Put species at one end, animalia at the other, and every step between is just a clade. Simple and done. Anyway, someone seems to have nailed the label Phylum onto Xenacoelomorpha in its article now. (talk) 18:43, 7 December 2019 (UTC)just a wiki reader