Talk:Acoma-Zuni Section

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled

edit

It appears that this "section" is non-existent. Checking the sources reveals no evidence of an "Acoma-Zuni Section" Suggest this article be marked for deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by The mobot (talkcontribs) 17:06, 14 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

I've removed the AFD tag, since the deletion process was never completed. Your rationale is that the article should be deleted because the subject doesn't exist, but the source (currently source #3, here) clearly references the existence of the Acoma-Zuni Section. Whether that is enough for an article, that's another question. But had I completed the AFD for you, with that rationale, it would likely have been speedy closed. I'm not up on my notability standards for geological features, so I can't tell you whether this meets those standards, but that angle might be worth exploring. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 18:56, 14 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Acoma-Zuni Section. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:19, 26 June 2017 (UTC)Reply