Talk:Acrocyanosis
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Kilbad in topic Benign vs. not-benign?
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
 | Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Acrocyanosis.
|
 | A fact from Acrocyanosis appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 July 2005. The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
Benign vs. not-benign?
editI don't see the reason for separate pages. They even include some of the same information. Perhaps simply including all the causes of acrocyanosis on one page, including a section on benign idiopathic acrocyanosis. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.91.118.195 (talk • contribs) 05:09 UTC, 20 January 2009
- Agreed, it should be merged. It's the same condition and they both could be explained on the same page. --IdLoveOne (talk) 19:27, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- Support as per nom. kilbad (talk) 16:31, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
Done. As per this discussion and User_talk:Arcadian#Odds_and_ends. ---kilbad (talk) 18:15, 29 April 2009 (UTC)