info

edit

is acronis feasible for companies which needs a low sized image and all what its need is the data as it selfs either than the whole image ?????????????????? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.118.1.162 (talk) 10:19, 17 December 2007 (UTC)Reply


Acronis is a backup solution perfect for all size backups. Even if it is just data files it does both perhaps Acronis Home 11 is sutable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.78.192.83 (talk) 23:57, 19 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Acronis is pretty spiffy and such and/or whatnot. However, shouldn't we mention on here that they signed a megadeal with WD pertaining to the fact that supposedly, anyone with a WD harddisk can run a specially-branded version of they disk cloning shizzle? Would seem relevant and such. 24.11.206.161 (talk) 18:14, 12 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Company states they have 1,000+ employees. And on LinkedIn they have 974. Should we update the number to 1,000? 165.225.38.186 (talk) 19:48, 10 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Acronis' recent hisotry

edit

Hello. I believe a few crucial updates from the recent history of the company are missing in the article. Full disclosure: I work for the company, that is why I am interested in suggesting the edits.

Technology partnerships with sports teams:

  • Technology partnership with Williams F1 team [1]
  • Technology partnership with Force India F1 team [2]
  • Technology partnership with NIO Formula E team [3]
  • Technology partnership with Arsenal Football Club [4]

Charity activity:

  • Acronis Foundation [5] Established a foundation to build schools in developing countries.
  • IT education program for former prison inmates in Singapore with Yellow Ribbon Fund [6]

It would be great to consider including this information. radiag (talk) 21:13, 31 August 2018 (UTC)Reply


Too much information. I suggest one line with references to the partnerships with big brands. Foundation is interesting, merits a separate page on Wiki. 165.225.38.186 (talk) 19:50, 10 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

References

"Acronis® Boot-time Restore" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Acronis® Boot-time Restore and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 15#Acronis® Boot-time Restore until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. BD2412 T 04:35, 15 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

"Acronis® Recovery Manager" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Acronis® Recovery Manager and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 15#Acronis® Recovery Manager until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. BD2412 T 04:35, 15 April 2022 (UTC)Reply