Talk:Act of 5th November

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Vegaswikian in topic Ordinal dates

Ordinal dates

edit
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move. We would need sources that show this is not the correct historical name or definitive sources to show that it has a different name. Vegaswikian (talk) 22:56, 26 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Act of 5th NovemberAct of 5 November relisted Dpmuk (talk) 12:02, 18 January 2011 (UTC) Move request started by User:Ohconfucius. 08:48, 14 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

  • Comment. Although the current title uses a date format contrary to wikipedia convention I think treating this purely as a date format issue is wrong as it's an article title. As such I think WP:COMMONNAME should apply and if "5th" is the common name it should stay. I'm not an expert on the subject and google searches aren't helping much and so I would like more information on the common name from more knowledgeable editors before supporting or opposing this move. Dpmuk (talk) 10:07, 14 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.