Talk:Actes et documents du Saint Siège relatifs à la Seconde Guerre Mondiale

Inclusions and Omissions

In the third paragraph the line "extensively listed the data revieved by the Vatican". Is the word revieved supposed to be reviewed? released? Not sure.. --Travver (talk) 06:05, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Language

It sounds French to me. Not Latin. Andries 21:57, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

My bad. Savidan 22:24, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

+Online availability=

It's seem very relevant that this material is now online. So I do think it deserves it's own section to draw the reader's attention to them. Also, when I put in the entry, it was only nine volumes. I checked again, and it's still Vols. 1-9. I'm assuming they haven't completed the digitized versions of Vols. 10 & 11. Also, when you access a volume, its entire contents is downloaded. It takes a few minutes even if you have a high-speed connection, but it's not an eternity (i.e. more than a few minutes.)Bronxpolwatcher (talk) 06:50, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Per WP:EL links should not be in the body of the article. I have downloaded all 11. They appear complete. Low-resolution, grainy, and near incomprehensible, but complete. Savidan 06:52, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Phayer a secular historian?=

How is Michael Phayer a "secular" historian? I understand that he is Catholic himself. Does secular that he is not a cleric? Others would assume by secular that he is not Catholic or religious.

The way he's put in in the Graham reads like a cheap shot. If Graham helped produce these volumes, which are primary source documents, then how can he be accused of "neglecting the context"? If the comment refers to Graham's other work such as his books and articles, then a better place for it is in the Graham article. From what I understand, Phayer's own work is controversial and has been criticized.Bronxpolwatcher (talk) 06:50, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

I have removed the word "secular". Savidan 06:53, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Actes et documents du Saint Siège relatifs à la Seconde Guerre Mondiale. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090704152250/http://www.canada.com:80/Life/Secret+archives+Pius+remain+closed+years/1752643/story.html to http://www.canada.com/Life/Secret+archives+Pius+remain+closed+years/1752643/story.html
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.libreriaeditricevaticana.com/it/catalogue/catalogo.jsp?cat=C69
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151221042531/http://www.vatican.va/archive/actes/index_en.htm to http://www.vatican.va/archive/actes/index_en.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:04, 3 October 2016 (UTC)