Talk:Action at Sihayo's Kraal/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Catlemur (talk · contribs) 09:31, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

I will start the review shortly.--Catlemur (talk) 09:31, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

• Wikilink Bashee River and Buffalo River.

• "Chelmsford ordered the force to cross the and prepare for action"

• Write (NNC) after the first mention of the Natal Native Contingent.

• There should be a sentence confirming that Mkumbikazulu was in command of the Zulus during the battle as well as the fact that his full name was Mkumbikazulu kaSihayo. Since this is mentioned in the infobox but not in the main body of the article.

• In General sources Knight, Ian (1992) remove "p. 37".

• Cite the sources used to create Sihayos kraal action map (cropped).png on its Commons page.

• Include the battle in the Anglo-Zulu War Navbox.--Catlemur (talk) 18:41, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Thanks Catlemur, I think I have addressed all these - Dumelow (talk) 19:05, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: --Catlemur (talk) 19:24, 8 December 2020 (UTC)