This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
Latest comment: 6 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion
I have tagged the article because in its current state, the article dedicates two small paragraphs to to actual battle and 3 sources when the rest of the article gives background and aftermath, both of which have {{main}} and {{see also}} hatnotes. The content around this actual skirmish, I argue, do not demonstrate notability for this battle and therefore deserve its own article. Would this be suited better for a section on a different article? microbiologyMarcus[petri dish·growths]02:27, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hello, i see your concerns, yet i have now found a source detailing the controntation way more, shouldnt i include that in the article? Tinkaer1991 (talk) 09:08, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
.jpg)
