Talk:Action of 28 January 1945/GA1
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Anotherclown in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Anotherclown (talk) 03:28, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Progression
edit- Version of the article when originally reviewed: [1]
- Version of the article when review was closed: [2]
Technical review
edit- Citations: - the citation check tool reveals no errors (no action required)
- Disambiguations: none found - [3] (no action required)
- Linkrot: Ext links all work - [4] (no action required)
- Alt text: Images lack alt text (although this is not a requirement for GA anyway so its up to you if you want to add it or not) - [5] (no action required)
Criteria
edit- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- You might considered putting something in the Lead to indicate that the action occurred during the Second World War;
- Done
- The first paragraph of the Background section is a little repetitive (use of January three times, and again in the first sentence of the second paragraph) - maybe reword a little?;
- Done
- I think the grammer in this sentence is a little off: "Upon sighting the German destroyers the British cruisers fired star shell and turned to the south on a course parallel to the German ships." Specifically was only one star shell fired or were there multiple? IMO it should be reworded to either "fired a star shell" or "fired star shells"; and
- Fixed. 'Star shell' is normally used in cases where multiple shells were fired (from memory), but this is probably needlessly technical/jargon as 'shells' works well
- The battle section has quite a number of stubby paragraphs. IMO these could be merged into 3 paragraphs which might make the prose flow a bit better. Specifically I would link the first and second paras and the third and fourth.
- Done
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
- a (tagged and captioned): b (Is illustrated with appropriate images): c (non-free images have fair use rationales): d public domain pictures appropriately demonstrate why they are public domain':
- Overall:
- a Pass/Fail:
- Just a couple of minor issues with prose as above. Anotherclown (talk) 04:09, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
- All comments addressed now, I think. Thanks for the review. Nick-D (talk) 07:47, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
- Cheers Nick. Looks good IMO. Happy to pass for GA. Well done. Anotherclown (talk) 23:02, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
- All comments addressed now, I think. Thanks for the review. Nick-D (talk) 07:47, 14 December 2010 (UTC)