Talk:Action of 7 May 1968/GA1
Latest comment: 13 years ago by SCB '92 in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: SCB '92 (talk · contribs) 10:23, 11 October 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Article looks alright
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- Why isn't North Vietnam wikilinked in the lede? any mention of the North Vietnamese Army?
- B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
- no problems here
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- no problems here
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- no problems here
- C. No original research:
- no problems here
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- no problems here
- B. Focused:
- no problems here
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- no problems here
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- no problems here
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- no problems here
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- no problems here
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- It's worthy of being a GA
- Pass or Fail: