Talk:Action of 9 July 1806
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Jackyd101 in topic GA Review
Action of 9 July 1806 has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
edit- This review is transcluded from Talk:Action of 9 July 1806/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
- GA review (see here for criteria)
This is a very nice article
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- What photograph?--Jackyd101 (talk) 10:23, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Not as smoothly written as some of your other articles, but still nicely done, and interesting.
- Pass/Fail:
- Thanks for the review and copyedit, much appreciated. If you have any further comments please let me know.--Jackyd101 (talk) 00:50, 27 September 2009 (UTC)