This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 00:41, November 26, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
This action was clearly an American victory, not a Japanese one, and Wikipedia is the only place where I have seen it called otherwise. Twenty-three large Japanese aircraft were destroyed with all of their crews for the loss of two small American aircraft and one pilot. The fact that these results were obtained in the air near the task force instead of on the ground at Rabaul is immaterial. TiC (talk) 19:46, 23 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
The Americans were turned back without launching the raid on Rabaul, so their mission was thwarted. The almost complete destruction of the 4th Ku, however, did have strategic consequences for the Japanese. It's hard to give the result in one pithy summary, like "American victory". Cla68 (talk) 23:38, 23 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
.jpg)
