Talk:Active radar homing

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

is "transciever" a typo? shouldn't it be "transceiver"? (clem 20:53, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC))

Best kill propablities?

Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Active radar homing missiles have some of the best kill probabillities...

I challenge that statement. Actually I think that radar homing missiles have pretty low kill proabilites, just look at the history of AIM7 and compare it to the AIM9. While radar homers have cought up they are still not that great. The low (compared to infrared or optical sensors) resolution, resulting from small seeker diameters and long wavelength, the active nature, the current trend of reduced radar signatures and enhancements in ECM makes it comparably easy to decoy them and this won't change much in future (IMHO). But of course, you can prove me wrong with some qualified sources. - Alureiter 14:50, 7 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Active Radar homing missiles can fly a lead pursuit intercept course instead of just follow it's target, because they can measure the target's velocity and direction of movement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.202.111.55 (talk) 00:08, 23 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

The Sparrow was a semi-active radar homing (SARH) missile, not active, so it's performance is totally irrelevant. - BilCat (talk) 03:15, 22 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Two issues

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Currently, the third disadvantage is listed as: These types of missiles with this mounted equipment are only effective in long range confrontations. I think this needs an explanation, because it sounds fishy to me. What distance is considered "long range?"

Also, the Vympel R-27AE employs active radar guidance and should be added to the list. 97.125.51.63 (talk) 21:37, 9 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Add topic