Talk:Acts 2 Network

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 18 January 2024 by reviewer Mach61 (talk · contribs).

California

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Christianity

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Why criticism of the church should stay in the article

Latest comment: 3 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion

206.71.234.163 reverted the article back to this version, stating the WP:ONUS on keeping information in was on those trying to include information, hence this discussion. In short, the sentence noting controversies should stay (and, if anything, be fleshed out into a paragraph as seen here because controversies makeup a significant part of the coverage of this organization in reliable sources, which we should follow per WP:WEIGHT. That sentence included citations to Christianity Today, The UC San Diego Triton, and Wired, or three of the four citations in the article at that time. Mach61 13:16, 5 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Please see WP:ATTACKPAGE 166.198.21.106 (talk) 19:11, 5 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Please explain to me how the current state of this article exists primarily to disparage or threaten its subject, which is what an attack page is. It contains one sentence, which is sourced, that mentions anything negative about the organization. Mach61 23:00, 5 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

August 2024 edit war

Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Looks like there has been an edit war on this page! According to the View History page, the war began August 1, 2024 when user KnowledgeExplorer42 replaced the entire article text with unsourced propaganda. User Mach61 responded, then 19 more back-and-forth edits occurred.

Today, I have restored the antebellum text. The most recent version was the August 7 version. This version contains uncited and poorly-cited information. It leaves the article in a worse state than it was antebellum, so I have decided the antebellum text is better than the August 7 text, and I have restored it.

If I may make a suggestion to all the big Wikipedians in charge here, I have a gut feeling that the organizational subject of this article is upset about being covered in Wikipedia. In response I would propose protecting and watching this page to prevent future mischief. That's just my suggestion. Percurrent (talk) 15:57, 18 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic