Talk:Acts of Sharbel

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of the Syriac Christianity work group, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive.

Women in Religion Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of the Women in Religion WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Women in religion. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Women in ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject Women in ReligionTemplate:WikiProject Women in ReligionWomen in Religion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Assyria

	This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Assyria, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Assyrian-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.AssyriaWikipedia:WikiProject AssyriaTemplate:WikiProject AssyriaAssyrian articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Merge process

Latest comment: 8 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

@Jclemens, Johnpacklambert, & Bearian The AfD discussion was resulted as "merge", so I would like to continue merging the articles. Straight forward, the only thing I can see for merging really is the infobox. — JudeccaXIII (talk) 05:02, 18 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

As far as I'm concerned, merge anything appropriate and leave the original article as a redirect. The important part in my mind is leaving the history viewable to non-admins. Jclemens (talk) 05:06, 18 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Second thought, not going to add the infobox...just the picture. For clarity reasons, the content on Sarbel and Barbe was entirely copied-&-pasted from this website. I'm surprised there were no copyright violation tags on the article, just saying. — JudeccaXIII (talk) 05:32, 18 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Jclemens Somewhat off topic, what rating would you give the quality of this article? C class, B class etc. Thanx — JudeccaXIII (talk) 22:51, 19 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

As long as the edit history is saved, and there is a redirect, I don't care where it goes and how much is saved. Bearian (talk) 01:51, 23 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic