Talk:Actual malice

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comments

Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

There appears to be a typo in this page. I believe that in the phrase "at the same time defining it in tems of the proof which had previously been usual", "tems" should be "terms". (For that matter, "which" should be "that": "at the same time defining it in terms of the proof that had previously been usual."

I am not a legal expert and therefore did not attempt to edit it.

The typo was in my text -- i have corrected it. Thanks for spottign it. DES 23:36, 25 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

Added a bit of text clarifying that the standard applies to public figures as well as public officials. Qualified the "reckless disregard" standard. 158.104.174.136 (talk) 22:59, 4 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Add topic