Talk:Actuarial Society of South Africa HIV/AIDS models

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Removing deleting proposal

edit

Removing deleting proposal tag because article is properly cited and written according to Wikipedia policies for more visit talk page. Faizan Munawar Varyachat contributions 13:48, 24 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion

edit

One should see the sources and citations for this article before proposing it for deleting, its properly cited this article should not be deleted as this is most important encyclopedic information for the world as ASSA AIDS MODELS has very important value in field medicine research on HIV / AIDS, its very notable, do not propose this article for deleting directly, if anyone has any question may write here on Talk Page of article, that would be highly appreciated if any user would like to contribute in it, Thanks. -- Faizan Munawar Varyachatcontributions 13:42, 24 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion Conversation

edit

Actuarial Society of South Africa HIV/AIDS Models Not notable. The refs are all first party ones except for one press release and one that briefly mentions the models. Other than that no indication of notability. JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 15:24, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

One should see the sources and citations for this article before proposing it for deleting, its properly cited this article should not be deleted as this is most important encyclopedic information for the world as ASSA AIDS MODELS has very important value in field medicine research on HIV / AIDS, its very notable and written according to Wikipedia Policies, I am agree on the point that content is less and may be citations are not proper however it can be improved, it should be keep as improved not for deletion of article because its notable, kindly share your views, Thanks. -- Faizan Munawar Varya chat contributions 15:35, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Keep. I believe that this article deals with an important topic, but its content needs to be strengthened. I see that its creator plans to strengthen it, so I suggest he is given time to do so. Regards, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 16:48, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 17:35, 24 June 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 17:35, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Keep A Google Books search for ASSA AIDS model turns up various publications discussing or using the model, so it seems reasonable to expect that this article can be improved through normal editing. AllyD (talk) 22:16, 24 June 2012 (UTC) A google search does not establish notability: see WP:GOOGLEHITS. It can be used to find reliable sources but they need to be found, in particular the ones which provide significant coverage of the topic as required for general notability.--JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 00:35, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Note that I specifically pointed not to Google Search, but to Google Books and to coverage of this specific actuarial model. See for example [1] from that page for the use of the model in SA govt decision making. AllyD (talk) 07:00, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

The fact that a joint task team of the National Department of Health and the Treasury used the ASSA model convinces me even more of its notability. George Custer's Sabre (talk) 07:24, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Keep Article has been improved since nomination by GorgeCustersSabre and again by myself. Although a couple of the independent sources are brief mentions, the International Monetary Fund publication is such a thorough examination of this actuarial model, I found more material for the article in it. Anarchangel (talk) 05:11, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Actuarial Society of South Africa HIV/AIDS models. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:38, 3 October 2016 (UTC)Reply