This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Prussia, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.
A fact from Adam, Count of Schwarzenberg appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 December 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The "Bailiwick of Brandenburg" sounds too much like the Mark of Brandenburg not to lose the uninitiated reader. The "Brandenburg Bailiwick of the Knights' Order of the Hospital of St John in Jerusalem" isn't immediately familiar. It should be disambiguated in a footnote. Elector John Sigismund's claims to Jülich and Cleves don't ring a bell to most readers, so statements that they were supported or not transfer no information: a footnote would tell what they were; there's a relevant article on the controversy somewhere at Wikipedia. Götzen needs a linking, whereas most of the redlinks in the article signal persons best dealt with in a single-sentence footnote ("footnote to history"), with birth-death dates in parentheses. --Wetman (talk) 21:54, 6 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
.svg)
