Talk:Adam (murder victim)

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Ryan Vesey in topic Body identified

New article title needed

edit

This article needs a new title. Torso in the Thames is unspecific (there have been many others). I believe it should be identified either by including a year or specifically with the 'Adam' name to set it apart. DreamGuy 14:15, August 23, 2005 (UTC)

I agree. BrainyBabe 09:46, 29 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
Done. Andrew Parodi 07:42, 14 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Nonsensical sentence

edit

Can anyone explain this? I have removed it until someone does. "Although she later denied this, she was DNA tested but found not to be Adam's murderer." Did someone intend to write that this woman is not Adam's mother? BrainyBabe 09:46, 29 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Non-English sources

edit

Adam - niedergemetzelt für ein blutiges Ritual SPIEGEL online (German)--84.152.209.173 14:33, 20 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Medicine murder ruled out?

edit

It was initially suspected that the murder was a muti or medicine murder […] the police ruled out this theory. There seems to be a lot of forensic evidence for a ritual background (see the German article). When did the police rule out this theory altogether? This would contradict other parts of the article: is believed to be linked to a ritual killing, deterrent for further ritual crimes --87.162.56.14 15:02, 20 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Body identified

edit

The body was identified today according to The Sun, a British tabloid. Would this constitute a reliable source?

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/3496737/Thames-torso-boy-identified-after-10-years.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sandroboy123 (talkcontribs) 18:46, 29 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

I don't think so,wait for a more reliable source using DNA testing rather than just guesses.Ryan Vesey (talk) 18:52, 29 March 2011 (UTC)Reply