Talk:Adam Craig (cyclist)

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Notice: This article does not verifiably establish WP:BIO

edit
 

In my opinion, this article either does not verifiably satisfy the Notability criteria for Biographies, or it may violate the Conflict of interest guideline, or perhaps it is a Copyright violation.


Untitled

edit

Wikipedia articles must be based on reliable sources to verify any claims of notability. Even though the lack of reliable sources in an article is not grounds for deletion in itself, an article with absolutely no sources (or only external links to unreliable ones) suggests to some editors that multiple reliable sources may not, in fact, exist.

Although I am considering tagging this article for deletion according to the Deletion policy, I am nonetheless willing to assist User:Rider33 (talk · contribs), and other recent contributors to this article, to make some constructive improvements to it ... I do not have time to examine this article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.

Please respond on this Discussion page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation.

To better understand why I have used this template, please read Flag templates for deletion warnings ... I realize that some of the expressed possible concerns may not be appropriate in this case.

Happy Editing! — 72.75.98.105 (talk · contribs) 22:22, 1 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Conflict of Interest

edit

Hello, fellow editors ...

Rider33 (talk · contribs) admits on their User page that they are the subject of this article that they have created, and thus they have violated WP:AUTO ... coupled with the lack of WP:RS secondary coverage to satisfy WP:BIO or WP:ATHLETE (links to the subject's own website are primary sources), I've put as much lipstick on this pig as I can, but I'm going to submit it for deletion Real Soon Now. — 72.75.98.105 (talk) 22:39, 1 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

My bad! Looks like they were just using their User page as a sandbox. — 72.75.98.105 (talk) 03:01, 3 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Lipstick on a pig

edit

Well, Olympian is sufficient WP:N for WP:ATHLETE, so I'm going to reformat the citations with {{Cite web}} templates, remove the Category:Flagged articles from this Discussion page, and then MOVE ON ... Happy Editing! — 72.75.82.202 (talk · contribs) 19:43, 4 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Done ... looks like I'd already removed it from Flagged articles. — 72.75.82.202 (talk) 20:07, 4 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Adam Craig. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:59, 3 October 2016 (UTC)Reply