 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Should he have his own page? The rule is eight episodes, and he is currently only been in three. Although I think it would be a good idea to keep this page until we learn weather he makes it past eight episodes or not? I think he will do. Sam1012233 21:30, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
- I think the page might have been created prematurely, but since I'm pretty sure he's going to make it at least 8 episodes it would be kind of silly to delete the page and then have to recreate it in a few weeks. Eatcacti 21:48, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Nathan-Fillion-10.jpg
edit
Image:Nathan-Fillion-10.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 23:05, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
Nathan Fillion is a popular actor, so I would bet the character stays on for a while (123.2.53.91 (talk) 08:27, 9 February 2008 (UTC))
Cause/Reason
editI'm pretty sure that "Shooting Wayne Davis" Isn't quite why the character left. As of now we are un-sure if he has left. It's one of many cliff-hangers.
Merge proposal
editI come with this proposal to merge Adam into the list of characters due to the fact that this article's subject has not managed to prove notability by its own. As notability is not inherited, being a character within a notable series makes not him automatically notable. Furthermore, there are no sections including impact in the real world and popular culture, as well as reception and coverage by a considerable amount of reliable secondary sources. Thoughts? --LoЯd ۞pεth 05:43, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
- A week has passed and there was not opposition at all. The article is then merged into the list. --LoЯd ۞pεth 05:50, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
- I won't oppose to this, as I somewhat agree. Adam was in only 11 episodes in one season, he wasn't a regular, he wasn't all that notable (despite still being very notable) and we all know he won't return because Nathan Fillion has a new show now. There are guest characters who deserve pages on DH wiki far more, like Ian Hainsworth and Felicia Tilman. But Lord Opeth, you should stop these. There were no oppositions because people didn't even notice this. If they did, they would probably reply, either to approve or reject, but you can't assume that because no one said anything it means they're all on board. If the pages were created, that means the characters are notable. - Renaboss (talk) 10:29, 29 March 2009 (UTC)