Talk:Additive rhythm and divisive rhythm

untitled

yeah okay...

Simetric

It's not true that an asymmetric rhythm could be translated into a simetric rhythm (like : 3+3+2 = 3+2+3), because groupings mean where is the stressed note. Like: 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 (1s being stresses)

I need to go away and think about this but at first the reference to 3+2+3 being regular doesn't sound right. 3+2+3 is just as irregular as 3+3+2. The weak downbeat halfway through the bar doesn't occur at the start of a rhythmic cell in either case...--Andybak

Needs elaboration

After having read this article, I still haven't the slightest clue what additive rhythm actually is. - furrykef (Talk at me) 11:38, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

I think this article needs examples, and I mean musical examples, and not just mentioning African o Indian music. --Drdq (talk) 00:14, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

can't really be made symmetrical so easily, I fear

A rhythm like 2+2+2+3 can't be made symmetrical just by starting one's count part-way through the sequence. (Try Bartok's Mikrokosmos, No. 152: Dance in Bulgarian Style No. 5.) And even something like 2+2+3, assuming it really constitutes a 7-beat unit, can't be considered symmetrical unless the listener loses count mid-way through the piece. Suggest losing that sentence. Charmii 04:23, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Opening sentence

• "In music, an additive rhythm is a rhythm in which larger periods of time [are] constructed from sequences of smaller rhythmic units added to the end of the previous unit."

The first sentence... doesn't appear to make any sense. Is it missing an "are" somewhere? I'm not sure exactly what its saying so I can't try to fix it. Bitwiseb (talk) 02:57, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Fixed back in December of '07. Hyacinth (talk) 05:34, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Sources

Do we have any sources, such as in the "Divisive structure in African music" section, which simply and clearly make their points rather than implying their points by arguing how the opposite is wrong? Hyacinth (talk) 23:23, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

hi Hyacinth,

I added a couple of quotes in the first three paragraphs on African music. These four sentences make the point:

• Rhythmic patterns are generated by simultaneously dividing a span of musical time by a triple-beat scheme and a duple-beat scheme.

• These beat schemes, in their generic forms, are simple divisions of the same musical period in equal units, producing varying rhythmic densities or motions.

• . . . the entire African rhythmic structure . . . is divisive in nature.

• The following measure is evenly divided by three beats and two beats.

--Dr clave (talk) 08:11, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Philip Glass Quote

I think Philip Glass summarized the subject of this article rather concisely in this quote:

"I would explain the difference between the use of Western and Indian music in the following way: In Western music we divide time — as if you were to take a length of time and slice it the way you slice a loaf of bread. In Indian music (and all the non-Western music with which I'm familiar), you take small units, or 'beats,' and string them together to make up larger time values."

http://www.philipglass.com/music/recordings/two_pages.php

Should we include it in the article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Keshidragon (talk • contribs) 15:54, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Removed: European metres

• European metres are divisive.{{Citation needed|date=April 2010}}<!--Perhaps the statement needs to be recast?-->

The above has been removed. Hyacinth (talk) 10:32, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Additive rhythm and divisive rhythm. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121123000213/https://home.comcast.net/~dzinyaladzekpo/Myth.html to https://home.comcast.net/~dzinyaladzekpo/Myth.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:22, 26 June 2017 (UTC)