Talk:Address confidentiality program

Latest comment: 8 days ago by Alison in topic Coronavirus section clunky


Untitled

edit

This has a lot of broken links. I'll try to update as many as I can. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.35.64.200 (talk) 23:44, 10 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

What links???

edit

The 'links' to the address confidentiality programs are just links to articles about those states; when clicked, they don't show the address confidentiality program(s) for those states. 71.139.160.146 (talk) 21:33, 21 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 14 external links on Address confidentiality program. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:27, 4 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Address confidentiality program. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:30, 26 June 2017 (UTC)Reply


Major Update and Reformatting

edit

Hello whoever is watching the page!

I've worked up an update to this page and have put it on my sandbox until it's finished and double checked. Feel free to comment. Natalie Bueno Vasquez (talk) 06:11, 8 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

edit

I think it would be extremely useful information for the table to have links to the websites of these programs. Collinanderson (talk) 08:14, 4 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Coronavirus section clunky

edit

Maybe it's just me, but that paragraph doesn't read well. Is "their" supposed to be "there" or is it referring to a group of people, but which ones? The section in general seems out of place as it's just for California. 2601:246:5B7F:FD10:A5A2:86A:206C:3932 (talk) 03:55, 17 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

  • I wrote that originally. It's a pretty common English construct, TBH, and the phrase "due to their being" is quite common; due to (as as result of) their (the officials) being subject to (being on the receiving end of) threats, etc, etc. - Alison talk 02:43, 24 November 2024 (UTC)Reply