Talk:Adel Abdulhehim
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Untitled
editIs this the same person as A'Del Abdu Al-Hakim? I have flagged these pages for merger, with discussion directed to the other talk page. —Wookipedian 00:23, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
- I just did a quick follow-up tidy, bit more to do...he is released now, yes? Do we have a source for that? Cheers Sherurcij (Speaker for the Dead) 02:39, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
- According to the Washington Post and Radio Free Asia, yes. —Wookipedian 04:48, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with File:AhmedAdil-AdilAbdulHakim-AbuBakrQassim.jpg
editThe image File:AhmedAdil-AdilAbdulHakim-AbuBakrQassim.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
- That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --08:11, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
removal of information
editThe "Bounty" section had this passage that i have removed for the following reasons: 1) The introduction of this passage (hidden in the template) does not make clear the real source for the text. 2) It is based on a questionable redacted primary source. 3) The introduction to this text presents the information as "brief biography" what i do not see as given. 4) The text includes allegation that needs multiply sources for verification. 5) The introduction to this text states that the source asserted: (all Uighur) "they where all caught at an "ETIM training camp". I do not see that a given in this reference. It may be the interpretation of the WP editor. I have strong concerns to present this information in the way it has been done here. Please discuss. IQinn (talk) 12:10, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
- 1) If the introduction does not make something clear, fix it! :)
- 2) I'm unsure how the tribunal proceedings of the US military can be dubbed "questionable", we qualify all the statements explaining they're American allegations.
- 3) I re-loaded the 78-page document to which you are referring, the biography is absolutely present. Your failure to find it reminds of your failure last week to notice there were two pages to a cited document - and your subsequent attempt to remove sourced information from the article. Read things more closely before assuming sources are lying.
- 4) The text does not require multiple sources, it has a valid, reliable source which is reporting on itself. We are not using the military source to cite facts about the prisoner, we are using the military source to cite facts about the military's claims.
- 5) See #3. Your failure to read sources carefully is not cause to delete sourced information.
- Reverted your removal of information, please do not do that in the future without consensus. Sherurcij (speaker for the dead) 04:08, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- Sherurcij you are edit warring! And you are acting against the consensus of the whole Wikipedia community!
- You have re-inserted controversial negative material into this BLP of a living person.
- You have done this against the fact that the editor who has removed it has stated his BLP concerns clearly in the edit history and talk page.
- You have not waited until consensus would have been achieved for re-inclusion.
- Your edit summary and the five points you list here as your response to my concerns are mostly wrong. The material is controversial and problematic and i am willing to discuss this in an orderly manner.
- I have checked the article, sources and your comment again carefully. I still have strong concerns.
- It is strong consensus on Wikipedia to remove and not to re-insert material that has been marked as possible problematic by other editors.
- I ask you in a friendly way to end your edit war and to remove this controversial negative material from this BLP article now until things for re-inclusion and way of presentation has been discussed and solved. IQinn (talk) 07:58, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Adel Abdulhehim. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110605050332/http://www.sr.se/ekot/arkiv.asp?DagensDatum=2008-06-19&Artikel=2145594 to http://www.sr.se/ekot/arkiv.asp?DagensDatum=2008-06-19&Artikel=2145594
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked=
to true
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:48, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Adel Abdulhehim. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Replaced archive link http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fservices.mcclatchyinteractive.com%2Fdetainees%3Fpage%3D2&date=2008-06-18 with https://web.archive.org/web/20080620093342/http://services.mcclatchyinteractive.com/detainees?page=2 on http://services.mcclatchyinteractive.com/detainees?page=2
- Replaced archive link http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdetainees.mcclatchydc.com%2Fdetainees%2F25&date=2008-08-01 with https://web.archive.org/web/20080626183800/http://detainees.mcclatchydc.com/detainees/25 on http://detainees.mcclatchydc.com/detainees/25
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929131759/http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/G/GUANTANAMO_DETAINEES?SITE=GAVAL&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT to http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/G/GUANTANAMO_DETAINEES?SITE=GAVAL&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:45, 4 October 2016 (UTC)