This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Composers, a group of editors writing and developing biographical articles about composers of all eras and styles. The project discussion page is the place to talk about technical and editorial issues and exchange ideas. New members are welcome!ComposersWikipedia:WikiProject ComposersTemplate:WikiProject ComposersComposers articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dance, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dance and Dance-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DanceWikipedia:WikiProject DanceTemplate:WikiProject DanceDance articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles
Latest comment: 13 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion
As promised, I've combed the archives to which I have access. The good news is that I've found a public domain picture of Mrs M. The bad news is that it's dreadful – a newspaper print from 1917 with about three dots to the inch. I've attacked it with Photoshop and Paintshop Pro, but with no discernible improvement. I have not felt justified in inserting it into your article, and I leave you to decide whether a frightful image is better or worse than none. Tim riley (talk) 10:56, 10 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Thanks Ssilvers, but even at 150px this would probably still be the worst image anywhere on WP! (hey maybe there's some sort of wiki award for that though). Seriously I don't think the reader would really get much out of seeing it! -- Aegoceras (talk) 21:55, 10 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Thanks Calliopejen1, the image is originally 1910 but at this link comes from a recent book on google books. Would this not be copyvio of either the book author or google books? My grasp of the legal principles here is pretty shaky, can you confirm it would be OK? --Aegoceras (talk) 23:15, 25 March 2011 (UTC)Reply