This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Some database links
editNRCS: USDA Plants Profile:
Main Entry for Cynoglossum grande:
- Entry: [1]
- Range Maps by state:
From the same main page, the CalPhotos archive (20 pics): [7] (And forgot to sign my name): Michael,FromYUMA,Az--Mmcannis 05:05, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cynoglossum grande. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111004094242/http://www.globaltwitcher.com/artspec_information.asp?thingid=97686 to http://www.globaltwitcher.com/artspec_information.asp?thingid=97686
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:14, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Name change
editIt would be nice to know why the taxonomic authorities changed the name. This happens a lot, because of molecular biological determinations, but why exactly in this instance? Same question applies in many others... It seems as if the common names have become more stable than the scientific ones. Larry Koenigsberg (talk) 01:01, 3 February 2024 (UTC)