Talk:Adi-Buddha

Buddhism Mid‑importance

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Nepal Low‑importance

	Nepal portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Assessment comment

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Adi-Buddha/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

It is incorrect to apply the term "demiurgic" to adi-buddha. Demiurge has negative connotations. The primordial buddha is clearly a blissful entity. Let terms like these be applyed to where they belong (gnosticism and greek philosophy). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.9.138.244 (talk) 22:37, 4 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 22:39, 4 September 2011 (UTC). Substituted at 06:42, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Mahadeva?

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The disambiguation page at Mahadeva lists this article as one of the meanings of the term "Mahadeva". Is this correct: is Adi-Buddha ever referred to using that term? – Uanfala (talk) 20:29, 11 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic