Talk:Admiral Hipper-class cruiser/GA1
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Canpark in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Canpark (talk) 13:19, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- The article provide detailed information on all the major aspects of the Admiral Hipper class battleship, which is useful to audiences with no prior knowledge of the topic. The differences between ships of the class are given in good detail, with cross references.
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- The article mainly focus on the Admiral Hipper battleships, no clear bias.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- This is yet another excellent article. There is no reason to leave it in the GA nomination queue, so I will pass it.Canpark (talk) 13:19, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
- Pass or Fail: