Talk:Admiral Lazarev-class monitor
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Jaguar in topic GA Review
 | Admiral Lazarev-class monitor has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: November 3, 2015. (Reviewed version). |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
.svg)
 | A fact from Admiral Lazarev-class monitor appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 20 December 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Admiral Lazarev-class monitor/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 22:08, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
Will be happy to offer a review. I suspect this review will be somewhat short given how well written the article appears to be JAGUAR 22:08, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
- Perhaps, but be sure to ask for clarifications if there are bit that need further/better explanations.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:22, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
Initial comments
edit- "Four ships were ordered, but the last two were significantly modified and became the separate Admiral Spiridov class" - were they modified during construction? If so might be worth mentioning in the lead
- "The Admiral Lazarevs were stricken from the Navy List in 1907 and 1909" - needs a "respectively" on the end
- I didn't actually name each ship, so respectively isn't needed.
- "In November the committee decided" - November 1863?
- "the two designs, whileAdmiral Chicagov and Admiral Spiridov" - space needed
- "The monitors were ultimately designed to be armed with six 20-caliberObukhov 9-inch rifled guns" - another space needed here?
- "The deck armor was in two layers with a total thickness of 1 inch" - I think "1 inch" could do with a conversion
- Converted on first use in the first section of the armor paragraph
- There's no mention on their scraping in the Construction and service (feel free to ignore this)
- Covered, with a cite, in the table.
Thanks for looking at this.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:22, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
On hold
editA very solid article. I could only find a handful of minor prose issues but once they're all addressed then this should be good to go. I hope I haven't made any "newbie" misunderstandings! 
JAGUAR 13:11, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for addressing them! This is good to go now.
JAGUAR 22:09, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
