 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
 | A fact from Adoration of the Magi (Signorelli) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 25 December 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| .jpg) |
- 10,186 views Johnbod (talk) 17:18, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 20:56, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the horses in Signorelli's Adoration of the Magi (pictured) have been said to be "badly-drawn ... with curious mannerisms of too closely-placed nostrils, and human eyebrows"? Source: Cruttwell, Maud, Luca Signorelli, p. 38
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Sybil Thorndike
- Comment: I'd like this to run on the 25th (see DYK talk on Holiday set). If it can't be done then, 6 January (Feast of the Epiphany) would be appropriate
5x expanded by Johnbod (talk). Self-nominated at 05:49, 19 December 2022 (UTC).
Interesting painting, on good sources, offline sources accepted AGF, no copyvio ovious. The image is licensed, but I think it doesn't show well in stamp size. How about using the crop that supports the hook? - For my taste, you could consider some changes to the article, but that's not in the way of DYK.
- Infobox
- A real lead, - no idea what Raphael has to in a lead for this painting
- Differentiate footnotes and references
- Be a bit more specific in the sources, such as not just saying "Louvre page" but repeat the title of the painting, - this could be the Louvre page about Raphael's ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:06, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
.jpg)
If there are image concerns, @Johnbod:, can these be resolved asap? Kingsif (talk) 16:12, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for the quick review Gerda! This is the pic crop with horses - I'm fine with using that. I will be improving the article further over the next few days, though oddly I'm not sure I will incorporating Gerda's points. Johnbod (talk) 16:23, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
- For the bot. Kingsif (talk) 16:30, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for the quick review Gerda! This is the pic crop with horses - I'm fine with using that. I will be improving the article further over the next few days, though oddly I'm not sure I will incorporating Gerda's points. Johnbod (talk) 16:23, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
