Talk:Adore You (Miley Cyrus song)

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Mikeblas in topic Fixing references
Good articleAdore You (Miley Cyrus song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 1, 2014Good article nomineeNot listed
April 15, 2014Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 2, 2014.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the music video for the song "Adore You" appears to simulate a sex tape?
Current status: Good article

Streaming songs

edit

Adore you was in the top of the streamings songs — Preceding unsigned comment added by Julyr222 (talkcontribs) 17:35, 26 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Portuguese charts

edit

Someone add Portuguese Chart please, it's not working for me.

Source: http://acharts.us/song/80809

FOTW-MC (talk) 09:43, 20 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Adore You. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:59, 27 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 6 December 2019

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: pages moved as requested at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 09:38, 29 December 2019 (UTC)Reply


This is a contested technical request (permalink). – Ammarpad (talk) 20:15, 6 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
So what should remain at Adore You? – Ammarpad (talk) 18:42, 6 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
Adore You (disambiguation) In ictu oculi (talk) 19:05, 6 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
Then a discussion should determine that. The article at the base, Adore You, was created in 2013 and is quite developed. Adore You (Jessie Ware song) is a two-sentence stub created this year and never developed an inch from that. The other page, Adore You (Harry Styles song) is another stub started just today, the dab page was created today also. This will benefit from proper RM discussion. – Ammarpad (talk) 20:10, 6 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.


Fixing references

edit

I've again rolled back some changes that remove verifiable references about the chart positions of this song. This fix also repairs referencing errors introducesd by the reference definition removal, as the references are used more than once in the article's text.

If there are concerns about the veracity of these references, please raise them specifically here so we can work out a less disruptive fix. -- Mikeblas (talk) 22:57, 23 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

I've again restored references that were removed without explanation. -- Mikeblas (talk) 18:32, 13 February 2021 (UTC)Reply