This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
As a governors wife she was the main female role model of the colony, which her substantial, and referenced, online encyklopedic article describes. That the article is unreferenced is just silly - it had a source, all you had to do whas to reference it, you can see for yourself that it confirms everything.--Aciram (talk) 14:22, 23 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
As I was stating, the one source (and yes, there is only one here) is not the main issue here. There has been very little editing here in the past 4 years, which is plenty of time for users to find relevant and sourced information about her. In addition, as I was saying, every information about her could be placed in her husband's article, as at the moment it is barely enough to fill a stub. That is, if somehow we manage to improve the article significantly, then the article is salvageable. Cheers! Double Plus Ungood (talk)14:54, 23 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
There are no time limit in aproving an article on wikipedia. That no one had the interest to improve it does not mean it can not be improved. The post on my talk page cleary said I could remove the tag. And you should really not remove references. She has her own article in a Dutch women's encylopedia. That is linked, and it clearly demonstrate that the article can be expanded. That no one has bothered to, still does not mean its impossible, as that link clearly proves. Cheers!--Aciram (talk) 15:37, 23 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
Excellent! I noticed how well-documented she was, and will close the discussion. The opinions are overwhelmingly for keep, and I do see the reasoning. I only saw mentions about her husbands on the article, but should have looked further for sources. Thanks for all you work and I hope we can improve it further to do her justice! Double Plus Ungood (talk)00:27, 25 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
