Wikipedia

Talk:Adullam Grove Nature Reserve

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

I don't know where the name of this page comes from, but other pages exist: Adullam and Cave of Adullam. Pages should be merged. --Sreifa (talk) 10:39, 2 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Merger proposal

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago10 comments6 people in discussion

Would like to merge all pages pertaining to Adullam; name of page not final. --Sreifa (talk) 15:33, 20 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Oppose merge. The pages Adullam and Cave of Adullam related to the Hebrew Bible are sufficiently different from the article on the modern nature reserve that a merge is, in my view, not appropriate. -- Radagast3 (talk) 20:20, 20 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

what if we call the page "Adulam" with a section on the NR that exists there today?--Sreifa (talk) 16:50, 24 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Comment I think we should merge this page into Adullam, instead. It would make more sense. Cave of Addulam could also merge there. Arlen22 (talk) 21:40, 20 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Oppose per Radagast3. A nature reserve is a geographical place based on some unique, rare, an /or endangered nature characteristic(s) the authorities deem worth protecting. On the other hand, if this was a national park, there would be a justification for merge since National Parks of Israel usually have a historical background, not a nature one. --Shuki (talk) 22:52, 20 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

As I said, "name of page not final". I'm open to suggestions on how to do it best. As for a nature reserves keeping rare or endangered characteristics, that is not always the case in Israel. Many times a reserve is declared just to curb building and other developments, and leave green areas. Also, while parks are usually maintained for visitors (nature-based or otherwise), not all reserves are maintained. I'm not sure what is unique about this particular reserve, but I'm fairly certain that we can find a way to present all the info on one page.--Sreifa (talk) 07:17, 21 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
Still oppose. A nature reserve to save grass and weeds as well as some flower is still a legitimate subject for a separate article. --Shuki (talk) 14:08, 21 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Oppose per Radagast3. TheCuriousGnome (talk) 17:06, 21 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Question—what is the reserve's relation with ancient Adullam or the Cave of Adullam? This is not entirely clear either from the three articles or this discussion. —Ynhockey (Talk) 19:07, 21 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

The tel thought to be the site of ancient Adulam is in the reserve/park, the caves, too.--Sreifa (talk) 18:56, 23 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

this article is about the park, not the nature reserve

edit
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

If the article is titled "Adulam Grove Nature Reserve" it should be only about the nature reserve. Shuki, your information is misleading. --Sreifa (talk) 10:40, 2 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Adullam Grove Nature Reserve. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:16, 4 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Adullam Grove Nature Reserve. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:32, 27 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Adullam_Grove_Nature_Reserve&oldid=1198051230"