Talk:Adult Swim in a Box
Adult Swim in a Box has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: July 6, 2014. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Adult Swim in a Box appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 July 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Adult Swim in a Box/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Tezero (talk · contribs) 02:22, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
As I myself have a Television GAN right now, I think it's only fair that I review someone else's. Tezero (talk) 02:22, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
- Intro shouldn't name quote-level pieces of reception with their sources. Too specific, especially since the intro's more than half as long as the rest of the body text combined.
- Removed.
- I don't know that the side-view boxart counts as fair use; it doesn't add anything but... well, a bit of the side view, which isn't standard coverage among TV show/media release articles as far as I'm aware.
- The box art show in the infobox is technically in the public domain, so I included the side view to possibly illustrate the product's physical dimensions as well as more of the box art. If it needs to be removed, however, I'm fine with that.
- Well... I suppose it'd be a pain to bring back if it was later determined that it would be necessary. I won't demand it be removed, but I caution you that it may be in the future. Tezero (talk) 04:08, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
- The box art show in the infobox is technically in the public domain, so I included the side view to possibly illustrate the product's physical dimensions as well as more of the box art. If it needs to be removed, however, I'm fine with that.
- The article is awfully short, barring the list. Is there any additional information - perhaps DVD commentary, blog posts, or tweets - that discusses how the shows were chosen, others that were considered, or everything being put together?
- That kind of information is rather sparse, I'm afraid. The more I research, the more I find reviews that I didn't include (A.V. Club and Wired, in specific). I could possibly elaborate that the network's official store, which once featured the set, is now defunct. Bit reaching, but it could add some context. 23W (talk) 03:58, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
- Yeah, might as well. Tezero (talk) 04:00, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
- That kind of information is rather sparse, I'm afraid. The more I research, the more I find reviews that I didn't include (A.V. Club and Wired, in specific). I could possibly elaborate that the network's official store, which once featured the set, is now defunct. Bit reaching, but it could add some context. 23W (talk) 03:58, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Tezero (talk) 03:07, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
- I expanded the release section a little, and also included those two reviews I mentioned into the reception section. Sorry it's a bit sparse as far as production is concerned, but with all that's been said about it, they might as well have pulled the shows out their ass and slapped a price tag on it. 23W (talk) 04:38, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
- Looks like you've done all you can with all that's around, and that's the most I can ask for. Nice work. Consider stopping by and reviewing Sonic X sometime if you have the chance. Tezero (talk) 04:41, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks! I'll definitely look at it. I'm not the best reviewer – I drafted a review once, but it went nowhere – but you gotta start somewhere. 23W (talk) 04:59, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
- Looks like you've done all you can with all that's around, and that's the most I can ask for. Nice work. Consider stopping by and reviewing Sonic X sometime if you have the chance. Tezero (talk) 04:41, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Adult Swim in a Box. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.adultswimshop.com/cat/DVD-Adult-Swim-in-a-Box-DVD-Set.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:43, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Adult Swim in a Box. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111006055704/http://www.jbhifionline.com.au/dvd/dvd-genres/anime/adult-swim-in-a-box-ltd-ed-starter-set/654277 to http://www.jbhifi.info/dvd/dvd-genres/comedy/adult-swim-meat-tray-collection/674133
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:36, 27 June 2017 (UTC)