Lead section difficult to read

edit

The lead section of this article is quite difficult to read. It may be improved if it actually started with a definition of 'adventure park' instead of a comparison with a 'ropes course'. I'm not sure how to phrase that though, partly because it's unclear to me what the definition is. Could somebody help? Mathonius (talk) 02:15, 21 April 2013 (UTC)Reply


Not always written from a neutral point of view

edit

The following paragraphs and phrases sound more like an advertisement than a Wikipedia article written from a neutral point of view:

Most kids love Adventure Parks. In a park they can act independently, try and fail and try again, and overcome their own fears without any risk (a continuous belay system is strongly recommended). Thanks to the variety of levels, each time they can push their own boundaries and reach their own challenges. This is a perfect outdoor activity (with individual, physical and mental challenges) to learn through play.

A good mix of elements and zip-lines increases the diversity and interest of parks – People love zip-lines.

2601:647:303:22D:8473:F508:76C2:351B (talk) 17:19, 27 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Yes, the whole article could do with rewriting, and it needs citations. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 23:26, 27 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:06, 10 January 2020 (UTC)Reply