Talk:Aenima (band)

Untitled

Why does Aenima lead to this page, when Aenima is FAR more known as the Tool song. Look it up in Google, Yahoo, or any other number of main search engines. If anything it should show the Tool song first and have a link to this obscure band's page.

The Tool song already has its own article using the correct spelling. See Ænima. Astronaut (talk) 23:25, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Aenima. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090529054202/http://www.webbworks.org:80/thelodge/aenimainterview.htm to http://www.webbworks.org/thelodge/aenimainterview.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071011112319/http://projekt.com/product.asp?dept%5Fid=20&sku=EQM00002 to http://www.projekt.com/product.asp?dept%5Fid=20&sku=EQM00002
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071021021452/http://projekt.com/product.asp?dept%5Fid=20&sku=MPP00984 to http://www.projekt.com/product.asp?dept_id=20&sku=MPP00984

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:15, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Requested move 5 March 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Old title redirected to Ænima. Jenks24 (talk) 09:00, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

---

Aenima → Aenima (band) – The Tool album (Ænima) seems to be the WP:PTOPIC overall. Per [1] [2] pageviews, [3][4] external sources, and [5][6] internal links (some of the links at "Aenima" are about Ænima). I'm opening this RM just in case. Also, if "Æ" is not desirable, the album might me moved to "Aenima". © Tbhotch^™ (en-2.5). 07:06, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

• Support per nom, the album is the primary topic here. Lugnuts ^{Precious bodily fluids} 09:37, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• Support per nom; the album is definitely the primary topic. I'm not even particularly a Tool fan — my taste in music generally leans much more folk rock than prog or heavy metal or wherever else you'd slot Tool — and I've heard of the Tool album often enough that I instinctively associated that word with the Tool album on sight, without even having to read the article first. Bearcat (talk) 05:50, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

re: name itself

i'm not entirely sure it is wise to, i guess, sort of "support" a band using the title of an unrelated and highly known album, a year after that album itself was released, not acknowledging from where they (painfully obviously) derived the term, and the aforementioned band themselves being what equates to a "local band." it would be like someone putting themselves on wikipedia from Small Town USA for being in a band called Antichrist Superstar, and being super vague about, or outright disregarding, the obviousness of their near-plagiarism. i understand the intent of the People and Musicians projects, but perhaps it would be prudent to contact the OP if possible and ask them to be a little less "OMG I'M FAMOUS." know what i mean? Passename666 (talk) 14:15, 15 December 2017 (UTC)