Talk:Aer Arann

Hubs and focus cities

According to ATI/Innovata (schedule information service), the current Aer Arann schedule includes:

• DUB: 10 destinations, 131 weekly departures
• ORK: 10 destinations, 63 weekly departures
• GWY: 6 destinations, 54 weekly departures

I've therefore changed the hubs/focus cities in the infobox to reflect this (which also matches the existing text). Ecozeppelin 12:50, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Silver Club

This section is clearly a marketing ploy by Aer Arann and is therefore completely inappropriate for Wikipedia. On that basis I have deleted this section. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.86.243.150 (talk) 17:02, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:RElogo.gif

Image:RElogo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:29, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 15:19, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Aer Arann destinations

I updated the destinations according to the Aer Arrann Website. Hope it wasn't a problem —Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.76.101.226 (talk) 20:33, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Aer Arann Bases

Waterford Base - 1 aircraft - serves Manchester London Luton, Brimingham & Lorient. Also serves Galway Lorient (on Saturdays}.

Isle of Man Base - 1 aircraft - serves London City.

Cork Airport Base - 0 Aer Arran aircraft but 1 ATR 72 for Aer Lingus Regional.

Dublin Airport Base - aircrafts which stay over in Donegal, Knock and one from 1 aircraft from Galway Base operate routes from Dublin to Sligh, Isle of Man, Cork, Glasgow from Dunegal and Belfast City from Cork. Also serves football flights to Manchester & Newcastle but 3 ATR 72 for Aer Lingus Regional.

Derry Airport Base - 1 aircraft - serves Manchester, Dublin & Edinbourgh.

Galway Airport Base - 3 aircraft - serves Manchester, London Luton, Waterford, Dublin, Edinbourgh & Lorient (on Tuesdays).

Donegal Airport - 1 aircraft stays overnight to operate early morning service to Dublin.

Knock Airport - 1 aircraft stays overnight to operate early morning service to Dublin.

View booking systems for where aircraft stay overnight and times

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamie2k9 (talk • contribs) 00:00, 3 March 2010 (UTC) 

Derry is not a base. The Derry routes are operated by Galway aircraft and crew. The crew just overnight in Derry, that doesn't make it a base. Jim236 (talk) 22:51, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Request for timestamping volatile information

As information about operations is subject to frequent changes, wouldn't it be helpful to add timestamps ((i.e. "as of March 2010")) ? Jan olieslagers (talk) 08:40, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Yes but would you call Cork a Base when Aer Arran have no aircraft there and their crew are operating for Aer Lingus Regional —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamie2k9 (talk • contribs) 23:22, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

No idea - I can only suppose it must depend on the definition of a "base"...? Jan olieslagers (talk) 14:24, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

ATR 72-500

Did the 4 ATR 72-550 leave and go to the Aer Lingus Regional fleet as of March 29 2010.

When did Aer Arran place an order for 5 more and have still got two of them in service.Jamie2k9 (talk) 11:13, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

fleet listing

why are wetleased Dorniers being listed as fleet? they'll only have them for a matter of weeks or days... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.71.15.123 (talk) 20:46, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Inclusion/removal of July 2011 crash-landing

I am initiating discussion because of an incipient edit war over the crash information. The inclusion criteria of WP:AIRCRASH say, among other things, that the damage to an aircraft must be serious to warrant inclusion of an incident/accident in an airline article. It does not say 'substantial', which by definition covers just about everything more than a dent by a bagagge loader. It is impossible to tell whether there is any structural damage to the ATR from photos that are available on the internet, but it doesn't look like serious damage and from my experience of other similar mishaps to aircraft, it is unlikely to be serious. IMO the onus is on those who want to include the information, to demonstrate that the damage to the aircraft is in fact serious. Under WP:GNG and the AIRCRASH criteria, the mere fact of the event occurring does not automatically confer notability. YSSYguy (talk) 05:10, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

• Agreed. It shouldn't be listed. --JetBlast (talk) 07:48, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

• It was on the news..doesn't that give it notability? --Antonio Hot Babe Martin (talk) 06:27, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

• Nope, please read here: WP:AIRCRASH. If we listed everything like this wikipedia would have pages of minor incidents like this. --JetBlast (talk) 09:27, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

• Jetblast, there are thousands of reports of minor incidents on other aviation pages....Antonio Mangorama Martin (talk) 19:38, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

• Well if you see them please remove them so the article complies with WP:AIRCRASH. Thanks --JetBlast (talk) 20:53, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

• Agreed. It shouldn't be listed. Jamie2k9 (talk) 00:25, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Re-opening discussion

The accident resulted in a hull-loss, which is confirmed by the AAIU final report which was released today. Therefore WP:AIRCRASH is now met, and the accident should be covered. Mjroots (talk) 19:46, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

The aircraft was beyond economic repair and was broken up after the accident so worthy of a mention. MilborneOne (talk) 20:44, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Agreed with the above. --JetBlast (talk) 21:00, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Suggest merging with Stobart Air

I would suggest merging the Aer Arann article with the Stobart Air article, with a redirect from Aer Arann to Stobart Air. Reason is that the two are essentially the same company, just renamed, i.e. all company history (contained in the Aer Arann article) is still relevant; even ownership hasn't changed, as Stobart Group have owned 45% of Aer Arann since 2010. In similar cases - e.g. the renaming of EADS to Airbus Group - the Wikipedia approach is the same one that I suggest for Aer Arann/Stobart Air, i.e. redirect from old name to new name.--afromme (talk) 15:05, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Additionally, I think that saying the airline went defunct on March 19, 2014 is incorrect, as the Aer Arann website is still operational, there is still no new logo, and the press release just states that the rebranding is to be completed by the end of the year, and is simply "the conclusion of the first phase of the airline’s ‘new beginning’ strategy.", as the press release says [1]--afromme (talk) 15:17, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

As seen by the real big mess up with EADS/Airbus it is sometimes best to leave the original named historic article and start again with the new name. MilborneOne (talk) 15:30, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

From an administrative point of view, it's of course more hassle to merge rather than just fork out, but forking out is simply inconsistent with Wikipedia policy, and confusing for readers. (Also, it's only administratively messy once a fork has already been created; in the German wikipedia, I was able to very simply move Aer Arann to Stobart Air, change pointers, and presto...). Additionally, it's simply incorrect to suggest (as the English wikipedia currently does) that Stobart Air is a different entity from Aer Arann and Aer Arann is now a defunct airline. It's the same company, with the same onwership, same staff, same fleet, just bearing a new name. So the only thing defunct is the old name. Besides EADS/Airbus Group, there's plenty of examples in the airline world where Wikipedia has a single entry for airlines that have undergone rebranding. For instance: USAir redirects to US Airways, Deutsche BA to DBA (airline), American Eagle Airlines redirects to Envoy Air, and so on. I don't see any reason to deviate from this approach specifically for Aer Arran/Stobart Air. --afromme (talk) 15:57, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Agreed it should be merged, it's exactly the same company, only the holding company has changed and the airline name. 146.199.33.185 (talk) 23:03, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

  Y Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 08:37, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aer Arann. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120218133616/http://www.aimawards.ie/2008/finalists/12marketingleader.htm to http://www.aimawards.ie/2008/finalists/12marketingleader.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:29, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Aer Arann. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100821211159/http://www.aerarann.com/about_us/contact.htm to http://www.aerarann.com/about_us/contact.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721125400/http://www.galwaynews.ie/2672-aer-arann-swoops-sponsor-galway to http://www.galwaynews.ie/2672-aer-arann-swoops-sponsor-galway

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:29, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aer Arann. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140320011954/http://aviationtribune.com/airlines/europe/item/1048-aer-arann-to-change-corporate-name-to-stobart-air to http://aviationtribune.com/airlines/europe/item/1048-aer-arann-to-change-corporate-name-to-stobart-air
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.stobartgroup.co.uk/assets/_files/documents/jun_11/STOBARTGROUPSITE__1307531512_Stobart_Group_Annual_Report_%26_.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:35, 4 June 2017 (UTC)