Talk:Aero Fighters Assault
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Aero Fighters Assault article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find video game sources: "Aero Fighters Assault" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
 | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
Dreamcast
editI could have sworn I played this at my neighbor's house with him on his Dreamcast a long time ago. But I can't seem to find anything in this article about it being on Dreamcast?--FifthCylon (talk) 01:41, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
Article's Title
editSome places have the title as 'Aero Fighters Assault', and the other games in the series also have the first two words separated, but I checked the artwork and packaging of the game and both the NTSC and PAL versions list the game on the box as "AeroFighters Assault," with a captial at Fighters but no space, this also confirms the way the box art seems to combine the two words. So I'm changing the articles title to match the official box name.
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Article moved, no objections after 24 days ~~ GB fan ~~ 07:19, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- Deletion of redirect denied by Admin, article not moved. ~~ GB fan ~~ 09:59, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
Aero Fighters Assault → AeroFighters Assault — I checked the artwork and packaging of the game and both the NTSC and PAL versions list the game on the box as "AeroFighters Assault," with a captial at Fighters but no space, this also confirms the way the box art seems to combine the two words. (Floppydog66 (talk) 16:01, 6 September 2010 (UTC)) Relisting Andrewa (talk) 01:17, 14 September 2010 (UTC).
Relisting because there's been no comment, the proposal reverses a previous move, and the contributor who moved it before is still active and should be consulted, so I'll post a heads-up to them. Andrewa (talk) 01:17, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.