Talk:Aeroscraft

Latest comment: 9 years ago by WorldwideAerosCorp in topic Contested deletion

Could someone find a picture? It would be good for this article. Scourgeofsmallishinsects 19:48, 1 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Maybe http://www.aerosml.com/ml866/img/top_model_left.jpg would do the trick? --Stephantom (talk) 23:02, 13 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Isn't this the same idea as the Aereon 26?--Syd Henderson (talk) 22:12, 13 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

"Aeroscraft" - is a name of hubrid class of airsips. Not the specific model. So, this article must be rewritten. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.84.68.0 (talk) 10:34, 8 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Aeroscraft finally debuted?

edit

A machine very similar to the aeroscraft debuted. The article doesn't mention specifically if it was an offshoot of the aeroscraft but the design is nearly identical.

http://security.blogs.cnn.com/2012/08/10/armys-all-seeing-super-blimp-makes-debut-flight/?hpt=hp_c2 ScienceApe (talk) 20:25, 10 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nope, the design is not at all identical. The LEMV is a hybrid airship. The aeroscraft is a rigid airship.

Pherm (talk) 20:42, 5 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Can't figure out the ref thing

edit

Added a mention of the 1964 story which uses the same technology, but I can't get the citation to appear correctly. Can someone please help? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.186.139.40 (talk) 21:15, 10 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit: Figured it out, I was trying to use a two word ref name which is not allowed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.186.139.40 (talk) 21:18, 10 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

The following links might be useful for this article:

dead link — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.82.97.172 (talk) 23:13, 9 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Contested deletion

edit

This article should not be speedy deleted as having no substantive content, because... ( The Aeroscraft should be a separate article as a product of Worldwide Aeros Corp. It is confusing for readers when there is so much text and not organized) --WorldwideAerosCorp (talk) 16:33, 28 October 2015 (UTC)Reply