Talk:Aerospace Defense Command

Expanded Article

Article has been expanded. Please re-evaluate.

Bwmoll3 19:05, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Further expansion

further expansion, B-class checklist #3 & #5 completed - NDCompuGeek 23:41, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Good article. Just a few comments.

First, the list of Air Divisions is incomplete. Missing include the 20th, 21st, 23rd, 24th, 27th, 31st, 34th, 35th and 36th. (The NORAD Divisions in Canada, e.g. 40th, 41st, etc. are beyong the scope of this article, although Air Division sectors did not stop at the border). ADC frequently redrew the map and redesignate ADs, most notably in late 1969. At that time, for example,35AD (Hancock Field, NY) absorbed 36AD (Topsham AFS, ME) and then was redesignated 21AD, while 33AD (Fort Lee AFS, VA) absorbed 32AD (Gunter AFB, AL) and 31AD (Oklahoma City AFS, OK, George Bush's AD) and was redesignated 20AD.

Second, when the BOMARC missile was phased out, the SAGE guidance sytem (TDDL, Time-Division Data Link) continued to be used for sending commands to Nike missiles and intertceptor autopilots.

Third, I take issue with the statement that "Most" ADC units were inactivated (deactivated?) by 1970. While ADs were consolidated (as noted above), and the radar screen was thinned by closing some radar stations inland, "most" units, of which Radar Squadrons and Air Defense Groups (Radar Squadrons with BUIC computers) were the majority, continued operating well into the 70's.

Fourth, the map of bases with active-duty fighter-interceptor squadrons covers the list of names and I don't know how to fix it. Also, it would be nice if it included bases which had Air National Guard fighter-interceptor squadrons on five-minute alert under ADC control since 1954.

Gatr 22:46, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

I vaguely recall that the abbrevation changed from ADC to ADCOM in 1975 when ADC became a specified command (or maybe 1968 when it became Aerospace Defense Command). In any case, I know it was ADCOM officially before its remnants became ADTAC - perhaps this should be included (or is and I just missed it) somewhere in the article or not if it's considered too nit picky.... jmdeur 16:45 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Citations?

Why are there no citations in this article? Dcs002 (talk) 02:07, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aerospace Defense Command. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150106170725/http://www.qtcommission.com/actions/GetPage.php?pageId=16&communityId=9 to http://www.qtcommission.com/actions/GetPage.php?pageId=16&communityId=9

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:32, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Aerospace Defense Command. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.cgsc.edu/carl/docrepository/FM44_1_1965.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120904055045/http://www.keesler.af.mil/shared/media/document/AFD-090203-089.pdf to http://www.keesler.af.mil/shared/media/document/AFD-090203-089.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051113175706/https://www.airforcehistory.hq.af.mil/Publications/Annotations/schaffelemerging.htm to http://www.airforcehistory.hq.af.mil/Publications/Annotations/schaffelemerging.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:39, 27 June 2017 (UTC)