Talk:After Many a Summer

Name of the book

Isn't the book's name after many a summer dies the swan ?--Mecanismo | Talk 22:54, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

Upon further reaserch, acording to Nicholas Murray's recient biography p.325 I see that After many a summer's title was added too on later publications by american publishers. However my american published version says 1st edition 1939 and it is After many a summer dies the swan. I have put in a summary and the box above as much as I could.

I don't understand why this book is not listed under its correct name. Moncrief 04:06, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

It was first published in the UK with the original title, when published in the US it acquired the more recent title. Please note that something that claims to be First Edition often means in that country rather than a "true" First. :: Kevinalewis : ^{(Talk Page)}/_(Desk) 08:58, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

First Edition Picture

The picture that is being used to demonstrate the article has a computer mouse visible in the top-left corner. --MosheA 17:35, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:AldousHuxley AfterManyASummer.jpg

Image:AldousHuxley AfterManyASummer.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:03, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 03:43, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Aftermanyasummer.jpg

Image:Aftermanyasummer.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 03:57, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:AldousHuxley AfterManyASummer.jpg

Image:AldousHuxley AfterManyASummer.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 18:59, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Huh?

"For, if individuality is not absolute, if personalities are illusory figments of a self-will disastrously blind to the reality of a more-than-personal consciousness" Is this a proper sentence? I read this as a "For" and two "if" clauses. No subject or verb. Typo? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Seanpatnaude (talk • contribs) 22:16, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

An image on this page may be deleted

This is an automated message regarding an image used on this page. The image File:AldousHuxley AfterManyASummer.jpg, found on After Many a Summer, has been nominated for deletion because it does not meet Wikipedia image policy. Please see the image description page for more details. If this message was sent in error (that is, the image is not up for deletion, or was left on the wrong talk page), please contact this bot's operator. STBotI (talk) 16:45, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Vocabulary

It should be mentioned that this book contains many words that are very obscure. I tried reading it in pre-internet days, and having a thick dictionary at my side was no help, as almost every page contained a word that wasn't even in the dictionary. I recall hearing that the book was sent to a Hollywood producer, who found it unreadable because of this. Another criticism is that Huxley does a lot of preaching through some of his characters. There should be a section on this book's reception. I generally like Huxley, but not this book. All of the characters are so contemptible that I didn't care enough about any of them to bother finishing the book.77Mike77 (talk) 14:16, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

..