Talk:Aftermath of the Egyptian Revolution of 2011

Merge

I think Timeline of the 2011 Egyptian revolution under the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces and Timeline of the 2011 Egyptian revolution under Mohamed Morsi (July–October 2012) should be merged into this article, considering the complete lack of information hear about the aftermath of the revolution and these timelines are not part of the revolution itself, which ended after Mubarak's ouster. Charles Essie (talk) 23:24, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Tend to Oppose - there is no problem to have timeline articles as long as they are not the only articles on the subject. Aftermath of the 2011 Egyptian revolution should summarize those timelines into a structured article.Greyshark09 (talk) 12:28, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

But the problem is that the revolution officially ended with Mubarak's ouster, which makes the nature of both timelines meaningless. Plus, this aftermath article is way too short and this is an ideal way to expand it. Charles Essie (talk) 16:07, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

We can rename the timelines:

Timeline of the 2011 Egyptian revolution under the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces -> Timeline of Egypt under the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces

Timeline of the 2011 Egyptian revolution under Mohamed Morsi (July–October 2012) -> Timeline of Egypt under Mohamed Morsi (July–October 2012).

Or some similar title.Greyshark09 (talk) 18:08, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Comment' - we probably should consider merging here or into the coup article the Aftermath of the 2013 Egyptian coup d'état.Greyshark09 (talk) 18:12, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Timeline pages without a main article don't have purpose, plus, they would both fit so well in this article (which is too short). The fact is that those pages, especially the second one (Mohamed Morsi July–October 2012), have no reason to exist by themselves. Charles Essie (talk) 01:35, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

expansion needed

Sorry for stating the obvious, but this article seriously needs some expansion, those tags are annoying. Has anyone read or can link to any retrospect analysis on the topics in question ? --PLNR (talk) 21:55, 23 February 2014 (UTC)