Talk:Agaricus deserticola

Latest comment: 2 years ago by 2A02:908:4B33:BD80:3C33:2E78:AA90:6B2C in topic Erroneous cladogram in "Classification and phylogeny" section
Featured articleAgaricus deserticola is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on September 24, 2016.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 15, 2010Good article nomineeListed
April 16, 2011Featured article candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 22, 2010.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the fruit bodies of the fungus Agaricus texensis (pictured) have adapted to growth in dry habitats?
Current status: Featured article

Erroneous cladogram in "Classification and phylogeny" section

edit

I have out-commented the cladogram, because it differs from the phylogeny as presented in the cited source, and as given doesn't even support the inclusion of "Longula" in Agaricus!

A.silvaticus (subgenus Pseudochitonia, outside consensus clades "IV/VI" in the cited source) is the outgroup among the 6 taxa used here. A.lanipes/maskae/subrutilescens form a clade (subgenus Spissicaulis, "I/C"), with the former two being sisters. A.aridicola (subgenus Minores, "I/B") and A.deserticola (subgenus Flavoagaricus, outside "I/A") are another clade, which is sister to the Spissicaulis clade.

In Newick format, it should be ( silvaticus, ( (aridicola, deserticola), ( (lanipes, maskae), subrutilescens ) ) )

Please correct. 2A02:908:4B33:BD80:3C33:2E78:AA90:6B2C (talk) 22:11, 16 October 2022 (UTC)Reply