Talk:Age and health concerns about Joe Biden

Latest comment: 14 days ago by Stranger43286 in topic Infobox

Title

edit

Grammatically speaking, shouldn't it be Age and health concerns about Joe Biden? The word "of" suggests that these are his personal concerns. Also, there was an article Health of Donald Trump, so perhaps this should be titled Health of Joe Biden? Abductive (reasoning) 09:15, 12 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Happy to change to either Health of Joe Biden or Age and health of Joe Biden after the AfD has completed. I think the title should mention age as that seems to be the main issue - this is different to Trump, where there is more speculation on physical/psychological health concerns on top of the age concerns. GnocchiFan (talk) 11:50, 12 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Sure. Abductive (reasoning) 12:08, 12 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
I guess that grammatical bit is technically correct, however, while it does look as though he's not concerned himself, it seems like he ultimately is, even if he appears not to be, and I think it was intended and understood that "of" was meant in the sense of "having to do with". If you change it to "about", that could mean "age and concerns around Joe Biden", which could widen the scope of the conversation so as to make it less precise and accurate than you intend. Tyrekecorrea (talk) 12:52, 12 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Yes, that “of” seems really weird… 86.31.178.164 (talk) 19:59, 25 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Now that the AfD is over, I have moved this article. GnocchiFan (talk) 20:24, 25 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Appropriate space for reference?

edit

Hello, I just added a reference at the end of the article’s overview. Since there were no other references in that paragraph, I wondered if that was the right place for this reference. Before I added the reference, the information in the second paragraph was unsourced. 76.170.142.83 (talk) 03:56, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Unnecessary page

edit

You can write the contents of this page on the Joe Biden page, but no, there has to be a separate page for every little thiny thing. The site is completely unnecessary. Cenbutz1 (talk) 08:49, 22 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

I fully agree. This doesn't need to be its own article. It's an aggregate of current news, doesn't provide new information, and is filled with speculation. I further don't see how future information could add enough to justify this pages current existence.
It should be merged with his personal article or simply deleted. Viiz1 (talk) 20:14, 6 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
agree Thingsomyipisntvisable2 (talk) 20:57, 10 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Infobox

edit

Is the infobox here necessary? My edit removing it was reverted by @Stranger43286 with the reason that Age and health concerns about Donald Trump also has one, even though it currently doesn't. I'd argue that neither article should have an infobox, as it doesn't really add anything. MW(tc) 18:57, 12 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

@The Midnite Wolf When I saw same article about Trump last time, It had infobox. I also think Infobox is useless, but I try to match it. BangladeshiStranger🇧🇩 (talk) 10:12, 13 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
Would you agree that neither article should have an infobox then? MW(tc) 16:30, 13 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
@The Midnite Wolf Yes. Also I removed Infobox. BangladeshiStranger🇧🇩 (talk) 02:18, 14 November 2024 (UTC)Reply